@jakearchibald, > Both waitUntil and respondWith take a promise. This means the API knows that an action completes, when it fails, and what the eventual value is, which is useful in the case of respondWith. I agree. This is the pattern we were looking for. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/webpayments/issues/41#issuecomment-183391069Received on Friday, 12 February 2016 16:13:51 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:43:14 UTC