- From: Dave Longley <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 08:12:58 -0800
- To: w3c/webpayments <webpayments@noreply.github.com>
Received on Friday, 12 February 2016 16:13:51 UTC
@jakearchibald, > Both waitUntil and respondWith take a promise. This means the API knows that an action completes, when it fails, and what the eventual value is, which is useful in the case of respondWith. I agree. This is the pattern we were looking for. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/webpayments/issues/41#issuecomment-183391069
Received on Friday, 12 February 2016 16:13:51 UTC