W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-payments-wg@w3.org > February 2016

Re: [webpayments] What is the appropriate conversational pattern for the API? (#55)

From: Rouslan Solomakhin <notifications@github.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 12:40:43 -0800
To: w3c/webpayments <webpayments@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <w3c/webpayments/issues/55/183052765@github.com>

I view events and callbacks as quite similar. Calling these functions "callbacks" makes more sense. I agree with @adrianhopebailie.

---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/webpayments/issues/55#issuecomment-183052765

Received on Thursday, 11 February 2016 20:41:13 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Manu Sporny: "Re: Checkout API spec published"
Previous message: Adrian Hope-Bailie: "Re: [webpayments] Should we expose status change events in the browser API? (#41)"
Maybe in reply to: Adrian Hope-Bailie: "Re: [webpayments] What is the appropriate conversational pattern for the API? (#55)"
Next in thread: Dave Longley: "Re: [webpayments] What is the appropriate conversational pattern for the API? (#55)"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:43:14 UTC