- From: Dan Brickley <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2016 04:51:28 -0800
- To: w3c/webpayments <webpayments@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: webpayments <public-payments-wg@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 3 February 2016 12:52:00 UTC
I will try to get some more detailed statistics published from Google, but as a first approximation I think I can reasonably share that we are seeing JSON-LD on several million sites. Prior to https://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.co.uk/2014/09/improved-sitelinks-search-box.html it was relatively obscure, except for use in email e.g. see https://developers.google.com/schemas/formats/json-ld . Since JSON-LD only became a W3C Recommendation in January 2014 this is pretty healthy adoption. I should also mention that while JSON-LD is increasingly favoured as a preferred syntax (over microdata/rdfa) for many Google features/products, there are some for which Microdata continues to be the preferred format. Since schema.org is defined in a syntax-neutral manner this is a relatively minor complication. See also https://developers.google.com/structured-data/ -> https://developers.google.com/structured-data/rich-snippets/products -> https://support.google.com/merchants/answer/6069143?hl=en danbri@google.com --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/webpayments/issues/27#issuecomment-179207196
Received on Wednesday, 3 February 2016 12:52:00 UTC