W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-payments-wg@w3.org > December 2016

Re: [w3c/webpayments] [Payment Request] Should we allow a "polling" mechanism for websites to not invoke the API if there are no enabled methods (#159)

From: ianbjacobs <notifications@github.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 07:55:29 -0800
To: w3c/webpayments <webpayments@noreply.github.com>
Cc: webpayments <public-payments-wg@w3.org>, Comment <comment@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <w3c/webpayments/issues/159/266467565@github.com>

Subsumed by https://github.com/w3c/browser-payment-api/issues/310

-- 
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/webpayments/issues/159#issuecomment-266467565

Received on Monday, 12 December 2016 18:03:27 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: ianbjacobs: "Re: [w3c/webpayments] Should payment method specifications contain WebIDL? (#133)"
Previous message: ianbjacobs: "Re: [w3c/webpayments] How should the group update documents in 'TR' space? (#167)"
In reply to: [ message archived in another list or period ]
Next in thread: ianbjacobs: "Re: [w3c/webpayments] [Payment Request] Should we allow a "polling" mechanism for websites to not invoke the API if there are no enabled methods (#159)"
Maybe reply: ianbjacobs: "Re: [w3c/webpayments] [Payment Request] Should we allow a "polling" mechanism for websites to not invoke the API if there are no enabled methods (#159)"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:43:20 UTC