W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-payments-wg@w3.org > December 2015

Re: [webpayments] Is tracking payment request state necessary? (#35)

From: Dave Longley <notifications@github.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 10:28:42 -0800
To: w3c/webpayments <webpayments@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <w3c/webpayments/issues/35/165539189@github.com>

-1 to reporting back state information if we can avoid it. I'd rather see lower-level APIs that the payee site can compose in a way that works for their flow.

---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/webpayments/issues/35#issuecomment-165539189

Received on Thursday, 17 December 2015 18:29:46 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Adam Forsyth: "Re: [paymentrequest] CurrencyAmount description has exponent sign wrong (#39)"
Previous message: Dave Longley: "Re: [webpayments] Is there an HTTP API based message flow? (#17)"
In reply to: Manu Sporny: "[webpayments] Is tracking payment request state necessary? (#35)"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:43:12 UTC