- From: Manu Sporny <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 20:47:43 -0800
- To: w3c/webpayments <webpayments@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 16 December 2015 04:48:18 UTC
The paymentRequest API tracks the payment request state: http://wicg.github.io/paymentrequest/specs/paymentrequest.html#paymentrequest-interface ```javascript enum PaymentRequestState { "created", "interactive", "delegated", "accepted", "closed" }; ``` The Web Payments CG Browser API proposal does not: http://wicg.github.io/web-payments-browser-api/#processing-a-payment-request Should we report payment request state back to the payee and enable the payee site to react as the payer proceeds through the payment flow? Or should we avoid exposing this level of detail in an effort to reduce the cognitive overhead for the developers (simpler API) and implementation complexity for the API (easier to implement for browser manufacturers)? In short, what are the use cases for reporting the payment request state back to the payee? --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/webpayments/issues/35
Received on Wednesday, 16 December 2015 04:48:18 UTC