W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-payments-wg@w3.org > December 2015

Re: [paymentrequest] Should well-known identifiers be used for ubiquitous payment methods (#35)

From: Ade Bateman <notifications@github.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 11:46:49 -0800
To: WICG/paymentrequest <paymentrequest@noreply.github.com>
Cc: webpayments <public-payments-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <WICG/paymentrequest/issues/35/163730601@github.com>
> We are talking about identifiers not namespaces so I think a lot of the reasons in that reference are irrelevant.

I didn't say all, I said some. And I still think many of them are relevant.

>how pretty or easy to remember they are is irrelevant to my mind.

We should keep in mind the [priority of constituencies](http://www.w3.org/TR/html-design-principles/#priority-of-constituencies). While users won't see these, potentially millions of developers will. Everytime somebody builds a web page that calls the API they will need to type these identifiers.

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Received on Thursday, 10 December 2015 19:47:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:43:12 UTC