W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-payments-wg@w3.org > December 2015

Re: [paymentrequest] Should well-known identifiers be used for ubiquitous payment methods (#35)

From: Ade Bateman <notifications@github.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 08:00:38 -0800
To: WICG/paymentrequest <paymentrequest@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <WICG/paymentrequest/issues/35/163669875@github.com>
Some of the problems are the same as XML Namespaces. Some points described [here](https://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/Why_no_namespaces) are relevant. Ian notes some (long, hard to remember) but also inconsistent (end in a slash? casing? https or http? include www.?).

I am reluctantly coming to terms with the fact that we will need to use something that either looks like a URL or that can be consistently mapped to a URL for #34 and in my mind this provides a stronger case for identifiers that are not a URL (which I had originally wanted to avoid).

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Received on Thursday, 10 December 2015 16:01:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:43:12 UTC