Re: [webpayments] Should Payment Method Identifiers and Messages be expressed using a Linked Data Vocabulary? (#29) from Manu Sporny on 2015-12-07 (public-payments-wg@w3.org from December 2015)

From: Manu Sporny <notifications@github.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2015 12:23:11 -0800
To: w3c/webpayments <webpayments@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <w3c/webpayments/issues/29/162649340@github.com>

> The quoted sentences make no mention of distributed extensibility.

Sorry, forgot to include another quote from the Payment Request Architecture document that does mention distributed extensibility. Changed the title of the issue to reflect more clearly what I was trying to get at.

> if the identifiers can be either URIs or WG-approved short strings, you get distributed extensibilitly through URIs.

It's true that you get distributed extensibility for the identifiers. It is not true that you get distributed extensibility for the messages.


---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/webpayments/issues/29#issuecomment-162649340

Received on Monday, 7 December 2015 20:23:51 UTC