W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-payments-wg@w3.org > December 2015

Re: [webpayments] Should Payment Method Identifiers and Messages be expressed using a Linked Data Vocabulary? (#29)

From: Adrian Hope-Bailie <notifications@github.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2015 01:46:02 -0800
To: w3c/webpayments <webpayments@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <w3c/webpayments/issues/29/163165064@github.com>

> It's true that you get distributed extensibility for the identifiers. It is not true that you get distributed extensibility for the messages.

Do we need this?

---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/webpayments/issues/29#issuecomment-163165064

Received on Wednesday, 9 December 2015 09:46:56 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Adrian Hope-Bailie: "Re: [webpayments] Should we be concerned about the use of the Browser API in a non-HTTPS environment? (#20)"
Previous message: Adrian Hope-Bailie: "Re: [webpayments] Payment Method Identifier Registry should have oversight / formal structure (#25)"
In reply to: Manu Sporny: "[webpayments] Should Payment Method Identifiers be a Linked Data Vocabulary? (#29)"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:43:12 UTC