- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Sun, 06 Dec 2015 20:54:38 -0500
- To: public-payments-wg@w3.org
On 12/04/2015 11:29 AM, Shane McCarron wrote: > I think for static publication (gh-pages, TR space) we would want > static SVG files just like we don't want ReSpec processing to occur. <bikeshed> +1 for static SVG in TR space +1 for static SVG in gh-pages date-stamped space -1 for static SVG in gh-pages Editor's draft space > I also think it is something we can put into a toolchain later. Can't we data-include the SVG images in ReSpec? Or *cough* find someone smart that knows ReSpec *looking at Shane* that could add that feature? > If you have a critical need right now I will spend a little time and > create something we can hook into github post-processing that will > automatically generate the SVG version whenever a pml is pushed or > something. Would that help? -1 for checking anything into Github that we don't have to. I don't think we have to check in static copies of SVG or PNG files into Github /unless/ we're creating date-stamped stuff. Even in that case, I think our toolchain should just include the SVG inline for specs. PNGs should be checked in only for date-stamped versions. The general principle is - don't check stuff in we don't absolutely have to. </bikeshed> -- manu -- Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny) Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: Web Payments: The Architect, the Sage, and the Moral Voice https://manu.sporny.org/2015/payments-collaboration/
Received on Monday, 7 December 2015 01:55:05 UTC