W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-payments-wg@w3.org > December 2015

Re: [webpayments] Should Payment Method Identifiers be a Linked Data Vocabulary? (#29)

From: Manu Sporny <notifications@github.com>
Date: Sun, 06 Dec 2015 15:12:11 -0800
To: w3c/webpayments <webpayments@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <w3c/webpayments/issues/29/162364118@github.com>
> Is there some clever way we can leverage the Schema.org work here too?

I spoke with @danbri (Dan Brickley, schema.org, Google) about it at W3C TPAC and he seemed to welcome bringing some of our payment vocab stuff into schema.org. Also note that Good Relations has already been integrated, so a large amount of the Commerce stuff we intend to work on eventually is already defined in schema.org. 

In general, +1 to use schema.org terms first, or attempt to put them into schema.org instead of maintaining our own vocabs.

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Received on Sunday, 6 December 2015 23:13:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:43:12 UTC