Re: [webpayments] Payment Request Architecture glossary should include IG glossary (#23)

PFWG has some code that limits the contents of the included glossary to
only the terms that are used.  That might be handy.

On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 1:02 PM, Manu Sporny <notifications@github.com>
wrote:

> We should also decide where the glossary goes in each spec. I propose that
> we put it up top, right after the introduction (other groups have found
> that this approach works for most readers).
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
> <https://github.com/w3c/webpayments/issues/23#issuecomment-162337189>.
>



-- 
Shane McCarron
halindrome@gmail.com


---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/webpayments/issues/23#issuecomment-162337587