W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-payments-wg@w3.org > December 2015

Re: [webpayments] Payment Request Architecture glossary should include IG glossary (#23)

From: ianbjacobs <notifications@github.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2015 06:28:45 -0800
To: w3c/webpayments <webpayments@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <w3c/webpayments/issues/23/162539517@github.com>
A document should define the terms that it needs. Before a global import, I think the editor should create a list of the words that look like they need definitions. Then we can cross-check with the IG glossary and do whatever is appropriate (e.g., import some, make changes, etc.). 

However, as with the discussion on the WG call the other day, I think it makes sense to allow the WG deliverables to evolve a bit first, so that we have some feedback on the definitions as needed in those docs. We can then align IG and WG terms as needed.

---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/webpayments/issues/23#issuecomment-162539517
Received on Monday, 7 December 2015 14:29:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:43:12 UTC