Re: [private-measurement] Request for help on multiple TAG reviews on measurement APIs (#22)

Overview and comparison of attribution/measurement proposals would be a helpful deliverable for this CG, to facilitate outside review and to set up the Working Group deliverable more clearly.

On the advertising-related terminology, the Improving Web Advertising Business Group has some documentation that might be useful (and that might generally be a good place for glossary and use-case development):
https://github.com/w3c/web-advertising/blob/main/support_for_advertising_use_cases.md
https://github.com/w3c/web-advertising/blob/main/OnlineAdvertisingParticipants.md

K-anonymity, however, isn't an advertising-specific term, and should just be defined wherever it's used with a reference to either the academic literature or some more accessible overview. PATCG has typically preferred not to rely on k-anonymity as a strong metric of privacy protection, so I don't expect it to be very heavily used here.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by npdoty
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/patcg/private-measurement/issues/22#issuecomment-1691724441 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Thursday, 24 August 2023 13:52:18 UTC