- From: Aram Zucker-Scharff via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 15:22:59 +0000
- To: public-patcg@w3.org
@jwrosewell I'll add again here: While I have great respect for both the GDPR and the UK... the entire world is not bound by those laws. Indeed, the current active US state laws include different definitions and restrictions than GDPR. We are a global organization, we cannot set ourselves to be bound by UK law in the way that you suggest, while it provides specific limits, those are not the bounds of this discussion. We can go beyond those bounds by agreement. The intent of the definitions in the privacy document are to find useful global definitions that can be used by all. Do you have alternative definitions to suggest? As for the TAG principles, the charter does not bind us to them, it merely states the truth: we are "motivated by" them. I disagree that this framing adds ANY confusion. What, exactly, among the TAG principles to you believe *should not* be considered as motivating our work? -- GitHub Notification of comment by AramZS Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/patcg/patwg-charter/issues/32#issuecomment-1170118015 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 29 June 2022 15:23:01 UTC