Re: [meetings] Agenda Request - what is the right scope for functionality that should be supported in the first iteration of the joint measurement effort? (#56)

Others of us managed to attend when the timing was bad for us personally.  We all have to contend with the occasional bad hour or public holiday conflict.

I'm personally not very happy with the late setting of the agenda for this particular meeting.  Receiving confirmations the day of the meeting has meant that I'm a little behind.  I might be ready in time for the second session, but it will be a push to get it done with less than 7 hours notice for the first.  

I understand if @marianapr has similar challenges; we've not had a lot of notice.  But if the problem is that there has been a lack of preparation, I don't want that being used to marginalize people who are disadvantaged by the timing of other meetings.   If the goal is to share the burden of meeting at awkward hours, cancellation works directly against that goal.

Ideally, we would have an agenda one week before a meeting; the requests were submitted well in advance of that.  Then lack of preparation time would not be an excuse to shorten those sessions that happen to be inconvenient for certain geographies.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by martinthomson
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/patcg/meetings/issues/56#issuecomment-1161146957 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Tuesday, 21 June 2022 02:43:13 UTC