Re: Comments on P3P WD Schema Stuff

But in this case, I would rather have it at the beginning of Section 5 
Dataschemas instead of melting it somewhat into 5.1.2. So what would be 
your suggestion?

Rigo

Am Monday 07 March 2005 16:23 verlautbarte Giles Hogben :
> I think something needs to be included to say that P3P is NEVER a
> request for a particular data type then.
> I'm trying to avoid the errors we had on this issue previously with
> people trying to use P3P as a wallet protocol.