- From: <giles.hogben@jrc.it>
- Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 10:00:46 +0200
- To: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
- Cc: "'public-p3p-spec'" <public-p3p-spec@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 23 August 2005 08:00:54 UTC
xsd:import looks closed to me. It validated so the syntax should be OK. Fine to change the namespace. Not sure I understand the last question. I would leave that up to Lorrie. ----- Original Message ----- From: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org> Date: Thursday, August 18, 2005 2:30 pm Subject: Base Data Schema definition
Giles,
in your new base data schema draft, you start like this:
<xsd:schema
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2002/01/BDSP3Pv1.1"
xmlns:p3p="http://www.w3.org/2002/01/P3Pv1"
xmlns:p3pbds="http://www.w3.org/2002/01/BDSP3Pv1.1"
elementFormDefault="qualified"
targetNamespace="http://www.w3.org/2002/01/BDSP3Pv1.1">
<xsd:import
schemaLocation="http://www.w3.org/2002/01/P3Pv1.xsd"
namespace="http://www.w3.org/2002/01/P3Pv1" />
I think, the targetNamespace MUST be something different. It should be a
new namespace. Suggestion is /2005/08/BDS-P3P11
You fail to close <xsd:import>
Does that mean, the old 1.0 Schema should be replaced in the Spec as it
is already in the 1.0 REC and can be imported from there? Or should we
provide a combined XML Schema?
Best,
Rigo
Received on Tuesday, 23 August 2005 08:00:54 UTC