- From: Lorrie Cranor <lorrie+@cs.cmu.edu>
- Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:14:21 -0400
- To: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
- Cc: 'public-p3p-spec' <public-p3p-spec@w3.org>
But there is nothing else in the data-group element except data references, so what is there to re-invent? What I am suggesting is we keep the old data-group element as is and we include an extension in the ENTITY element that has the new format for the data-group element. Old user agents can ignore the extension. New user agents can ignore the data-group element. Lorrie On Sep 29, 2004, at 2:01 PM, Rigo Wenning wrote: > Because it would mean, that we would have to re-invent the whole > data-group element and not just the schema filling it out. > > Rigo > > > Am Wednesday 29 September 2004 19:28 verlautbarte Lorrie Cranor : >> An answer to my own question just occurred to me... why does the >> extension have to go inside the data group element? Why can't we put >> it in the ENTITY element itself? >>
Received on Wednesday, 29 September 2004 18:14:33 UTC