- From: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 20:01:06 +0200
- To: Lorrie Cranor <lorrie+@cs.cmu.edu>
- Cc: 'public-p3p-spec' <public-p3p-spec@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 29 September 2004 18:01:18 UTC
Because it would mean, that we would have to re-invent the whole data-group element and not just the schema filling it out. Rigo Am Wednesday 29 September 2004 19:28 verlautbarte Lorrie Cranor : > An answer to my own question just occurred to me... why does the > extension have to go inside the data group element? Why can't we put > it in the ENTITY element itself? >
Received on Wednesday, 29 September 2004 18:01:18 UTC