- From: Michael Schneider <schneid@fzi.de>
- Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 23:59:20 +0200
- To: "public-owl-wg@w3.org" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Hi! Here are a few things that I found while checking through the documents. I will split up the list into document-specific issues that would need to be addressed by the respective document editors, and general issues that are probably best addressed by Sandro (or whoever currently builds the documents). == Document-Specific Issues == 01) RDF Mapping: Table 11 on parsing object property expressions has now an extended condition: "OPE(_:x) = \epsilon". While I don't see an immediate problem with this condition, I don't understand why it has been introduced. In comparison, for class expressions, AFAICT, there are never any conditions on the root blank nodes. I believe it is stated elsewhere, that blank nodes for expressions must not be reused, so this condition seems redundant to me. But there may well be a reason for it. 02) Structural Spec §2.2, duplicate word: "must must" 03) Structural Spec §11.2, "Restriction on Anonymous Individuals": grammar error (probably): "each tree in F contains at least one _an_ ..." 04) rdfPlainLiteral: misses the standard changelog item about XSD datatypes, although it is affected by the XSD Datatype issue, because it refers to the XSD datatypes spec. == General Issues == 05) Changelog: Some documents contain the item "Minor typographical errors were corrected as detailed on the OWL 2 Errata page." It's not always only typographical errors (that would be stuff like forgotten boldface rendering of characters, and such). Mostly, it's been some form of editorial error (not only typographical), and in few cases, there have even been technical changes. I would simply remove the word "typographical". As the item points to the errata, people can easily check what has actually been done for the particular document. 06) Changelog: The title of the new section "Changes Since Recommendation" should perhaps be more distinctive, including somthing like "(first version)" or so. Maybe this one won't be the only revision. :-) 07) Document header page: For some documents, the "previous version" is the Rec as of 20091027 (e.g. Document Overview or XML Serialization), for other documents, it is an unknown version as of 20120808 (e.g. RDF-Based Semantics, Profiles). This will probably change in the final version, but I mention it just to be save that it isn't missed. 08) Document header page: Different documents show different dates for the Review ("W3C Members please review..."). Again, this will probably be fixed in the PR version, but, again, I mention it to be save. Cheers, Michael
Received on Wednesday, 26 September 2012 21:59:45 UTC