- From: Jie Bao <baojie@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 08:54:42 -0400
- To: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Cc: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, Michael Schneider <schneid@fzi.de>, public-owl-wg@w3.org, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 8:45 AM, Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk> wrote: > First: HURRAH! > > Second: Congrats! > > Third: Wow, it's functionally over. We hit rec in 2 years which was longer > than I had hoped, but given some of the issues unearthed (and the resulting > quality) isn't too bad at all. I, personally, have been working toward this > since at least 2005 (as have many other folks), so it's exciting to hit > completion and for completion not to be a deathmarch thing :) > > On 28 Oct 2009, at 10:42, Ivan Herman wrote: > [snip] >> >> We would also have to have some discussions on what should happen on the >> community side; what should happen with /2004/OWL, where would we >> collect implementation data for OWL etc. I am in favour of some wiki >> based solution, and we will have to work out the details before the end >> of the year... > > The webont.org wiki hasn't gotten a huge amount of traction but it is > available. Maintaining lists of tools and tutorials and extensions and > applications is a good thing. > I'm personally interested in publishing the OWL WG data (wiki, documents, members, issues, actions, meetings) as "linked data". But I really don't know how long it will take if it is just me as a hobby project. The OWL WG should use OWL 2 for its own sake :) Jie ----- Jie Bao http://www.cs.rpi.edu/~baojie > Cheers, > Bijan. > > >
Received on Wednesday, 28 October 2009 12:55:42 UTC