RE: XML Schema

Ah, I see!

Thanks,
Michael

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Alan Ruttenberg [mailto:alanruttenberg@gmail.com]
>Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2009 2:08 PM
>To: Michael Schneider
>Cc: <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
>Subject: Re: XML Schema
>
>http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-xml-serialization/
>
>-Alan
>
>On Oct 18, 2009, at 7:58 AM, "Michael Schneider" <schneid@fzi.de> wrote:
>
>> [posting to public-owl-wg, not to the comments list]
>>
>> Hi WG!
>>
>> Does anybody understand the comment below? By "the normative
>> specification",
>> Thorsten is probably referring to the syntactic restrictions of OWL
>> 2 DL. But
>> what does he mean by "XML Schema of OWL 2"? Does he mean the owl.owl
>> file? And
>> if so, what does he mean by the suggestion "to bring these
>> constraints into"
>> it? Let me note that the owl.owl ontology does not contain any
>> bNodes, let
>> alone bNodes occurring in axioms built from the mentioned language
>> features.
>>
>> Michael
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: public-owl-comments-request@w3.org
>> [mailto:public-owl-comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Thorsten
>> Liebig
>> Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2009 10:49 AM
>> To: public-owl-comments@w3.org
>> Subject: XML Schema
>>
>> According to the normative specification anonymous individuals cannot
>> appear in the following axioms: SameIndividual, DifferentIndividuals,
>> NegativeObjectPropertyAssertion, and NegativeDataPropertyAssertion.
>>
>> I suggest to bring this constraints into the XML Schema of OWL 2.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Thorsten Liebig
>>