- From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 08:08:21 -0400
- To: Michael Schneider <schneid@fzi.de>
- Cc: "<public-owl-wg@w3.org>" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-xml-serialization/ -Alan On Oct 18, 2009, at 7:58 AM, "Michael Schneider" <schneid@fzi.de> wrote: > [posting to public-owl-wg, not to the comments list] > > Hi WG! > > Does anybody understand the comment below? By "the normative > specification", > Thorsten is probably referring to the syntactic restrictions of OWL > 2 DL. But > what does he mean by "XML Schema of OWL 2"? Does he mean the owl.owl > file? And > if so, what does he mean by the suggestion "to bring these > constraints into" > it? Let me note that the owl.owl ontology does not contain any > bNodes, let > alone bNodes occurring in axioms built from the mentioned language > features. > > Michael > > -----Original Message----- > From: public-owl-comments-request@w3.org > [mailto:public-owl-comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Thorsten > Liebig > Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2009 10:49 AM > To: public-owl-comments@w3.org > Subject: XML Schema > > According to the normative specification anonymous individuals cannot > appear in the following axioms: SameIndividual, DifferentIndividuals, > NegativeObjectPropertyAssertion, and NegativeDataPropertyAssertion. > > I suggest to bring this constraints into the XML Schema of OWL 2. > > Regards, > Thorsten Liebig >
Received on Sunday, 18 October 2009 12:09:02 UTC