- From: Michael Schneider <schneid@fzi.de>
- Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 11:15:06 +0200
- To: <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
- Cc: "Sandro Hawke" <sandro@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <0EF30CAA69519C4CB91D01481AEA06A0017EC232@judith.fzi.de>
Hi! This just came to mind: There has recently been discussion [1] about owl.owl. If I correctly understand the original poster, he was wondering why this ontology isn't represented in the OWL 2 documents. You may remember that owl.owl /was/ represented in OWL 1 as an (non-normative) appendix in the OWL Reference [2]. Anyway, the essential content (excluding annotations) of the new owl.owl file happens to be represented (or "backed") in our document suite as well, although in a very non-obvious way by means of two tables on "axiomatic triples" in the RDF-Based Semantics [3a,3b] (btw, that's again a non-normative appendix). This alignment was what I was working on and which took me most of the time when I re-designed owl.owl at that time. But without having a note on this alignment somewhere it will, at best, look like an accidental coincidence, if anyone will notice it at all. So I wonder whether we should make this connection explicit by adding text like the following to the comment in the ontology header of owl.owl: The content of this ontology corresponds to Tables 6.1 and 6.2 in Section 6.4 of the OWL 2 RDF-Based Semantics specification at http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-rdf-based-semantics/. Note that those tables do not include the different annotations (labels, comments and rdfs:isDefinedBy links) used in this file. Any comments (beyond the above :))? Cheers, Michael [1] <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-dev/2009OctDec/0006.html> [2] <http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-ref/#appB> [3a] <http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-rdf-based-semantics/#table-axiomatic-classes> [3b] <http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-rdf-based-semantics/#table-axiomatic-properties> >-----Original Message----- >From: public-owl-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-owl-wg-request@w3.org] >On Behalf Of Sandro Hawke >Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2009 6:35 AM >To: public-owl-wg@w3.org >Subject: the owl.owl file > > >I converted what Michael prepared at: > > http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Owl2DotOwlDevel > >to an RDF/XML file, currently at: > > http://www.w3.org/2009/10/beta-owl > >I modified it, in a manner documented in comments, so that it currently >thinks the OWL 2 namespace is: > > http://www.w3.org/2009/10/beta-owl# > >so that tools that do namespace dereferencing can try it out, using this >different namespace. > >The plan is to change that back to: > > http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl# > >and publish it at > > http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl > >when OWL 2 is published as a Recommendation. > >I plan to at least add the GRDDL triple, shortly, so I can test GRDDL >transforms. > > -- Sandro -- Dipl.-Inform. Michael Schneider Research Scientist, Information Process Engineering (IPE) Tel : +49-721-9654-726 Fax : +49-721-9654-727 Email: michael.schneider@fzi.de WWW : http://www.fzi.de/michael.schneider ======================================================================= FZI Forschungszentrum Informatik an der Universität Karlsruhe Haid-und-Neu-Str. 10-14, D-76131 Karlsruhe Tel.: +49-721-9654-0, Fax: +49-721-9654-959 Stiftung des bürgerlichen Rechts, Az 14-0563.1, RP Karlsruhe Vorstand: Prof. Dr.-Ing. Rüdiger Dillmann, Dipl. Wi.-Ing. Michael Flor, Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Wolffried Stucky, Prof. Dr. Rudi Studer Vorsitzender des Kuratoriums: Ministerialdirigent Günther Leßnerkraus =======================================================================
Received on Friday, 16 October 2009 09:15:42 UTC