- From: Bene Rodriguez-Castro <beroca@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 18:20:24 +0100
- To: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Cc: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, public-owl-dev@w3.org
Thank you all for your comments. > Please note that the file you were using (owl.owl) is in the process of > being updated. Once that is complete and published you should be able to > load it in the editor of your choice and have the same experience you did > with the OWL 1 owl.owl file. I was a bit puzzled not being able to find an OWL 2 specific file/URI in the OWL 2 related documentation but not any more :) > There are some people (myself included) who think this is not a good way to > learn or explore OWL (1 or 2). There was quite a debate about it between me > (anti) and Holger Knublauch (pro) recently which you might find interesting: > > <http://www.w3.org/mid/B6D22E33-5332-4CF3-8582-F6A033BE4C7B@topquadrant.com> Thanks for the interesting thread. As an OWL user, my idea was not to use the owl.owl file as a starting point for new ontology models. However, I find it useful when it is open on an ontology editor as a separate "quick look-up kind-of reference card" of the OWL modelling elements (specially for those less frequently used). Cheers, Bene Rodriguez
Received on Tuesday, 13 October 2009 17:20:57 UTC