- From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 15:17:23 -0400
- To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Cc: public-owl-wg@w3.org
You are looking at the (advertised) buggy output of the current OWL API. The normative RDF/XML for these tests are on pages pointed to on the wiki page: http://km.aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de/projects/owltests/index.php/New-Feature-ObjectQCR-001-RDFXML These validate properly. -Alan On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Sandro Hawke<sandro@w3.org> wrote: > Looking at a random test case: > http://km.aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de/projects/owltests/index.php/New-Feature-ObjectQCR-001 > > I find the provided RDF/XML (attached) isn't well-formed XML. I expect > the problem is pervasive. > > FWIW, the version in the all.rdf, which is somewhat different, looks > okay. (It's also attached.) I suppose we're running some bleeding edge > converter to produce the RDF/XML? > > -- Sandro > > >
Received on Sunday, 26 July 2009 19:18:23 UTC