- From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 15:28:29 +0100
- To: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
- Cc: W3C OWL Working Group <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
On 4 Aug 2009, at 11:50, Ian Horrocks wrote: This line seems to be incorrect: """Regarding imports, the direct semantics operates on ontology structures; it therefore has nothing to say about importation, which operates on ontology documents.""" Importation exists in ontology structures (see <http://www.w3.org/ 2007/OWL/wiki/Syntax#Ontologies> """Apart from axioms, ontologies can also contain ontology annotations (as described in more detail in Section 3.5), and they can also import other ontologies (as described in Section 3.4).""") But we can respond more directly to what he wrote: """I find it strange that imports is not mentioned at all in the Direct Semantics. I think it should be explicit that the semantics should be applied to the axiom closure of the ontology. """ with ""Actually, you can see from: <http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Direct_Semantics#Ontologies> (An interpretation I satisfies an OWL 2 ontology O if all axioms in the axiom closure of O (with anonymous individuals standardized apart as described in Section 5.6.2 of the OWL 2 Specification [OWL 2 Specification]) are satisfied in I w.r.t. O.) that the direct semantics of OWL ontologies is explicitly applied to the axiom closure (with at link back to the definition of axiom closure).""" Cheers, Bijan.
Received on Tuesday, 4 August 2009 14:24:06 UTC