- From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 14:08:23 +0100
- To: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
- Cc: W3C OWL Working Group <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
On 4 Aug 2009, at 11:50, Ian Horrocks wrote: > I have drafted responses to the comments from Gioele Barabucci[1] > and Jeff Heflin [2]. > > Let me know if you are (un)happy with these responses. > > Ian > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/LC3_Responses/GB1 > [2] http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/LC3_Responses/JH1 I wonder if we should add for [2] "arithmetic" operations, that there are two sorts of ways of adding "built-ins": Data oriented as done by rules, and modeling oriented as added by n-ary predicates. In the case of the former, we defer to RIF and expect progress there. For the latter, we've at least sketched out a clear extension model and thus have made room for coordinated evolution there as well. Cheers, Bijan.
Received on Tuesday, 4 August 2009 13:04:00 UTC