- From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 16:45:12 +0100
- To: Jie Bao <baojie@cs.rpi.edu>
- Cc: OWL 2 <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
On 15 Apr 2009, at 16:32, Jie Bao wrote: > Hi > > Just to get some vogue idea how many pages QRG in print will have, > I made a quick and dirty copy+paste into word and did a few layout > setting [1]. Please don't be under the impression that this will be > the final print version, or anything close. > > I don't think we may make a 2 page version any more with current > contents. Currently it is 4 using Times New Roman font size 8. > > My heart still loves a 2 page version. Maybe one thing we can do > is to reduce 3-column _tables_ into 2 column by dropping the first > one (features), because 1) in print version links to primer and > NF&R will not be needed; 2) many of the functional syntax is self- > explanatory (e.g., SubclassOf), we only need to comment those that > are not (e.g., ObjectHasSelf). Even there, we could "stack" the "feature name" and the FS, e.g., by adding a comment rather than putting the feature name in its own cell. Or have a +------------+--------------------+ +------------+ + +------------+--------------------+ Style layout. > This will enable 3-column _document layout_ (as OWL 1 card [2] is) > may save some space. Datatype section can also save some. I think there's a fair bit of space to be gained before having to cut material. Look at binary data...that should be 1 line. Cheers, Bijan.
Received on Wednesday, 15 April 2009 15:41:50 UTC