- From: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 17:59:45 +0100
- To: Christine Golbreich <cgolbrei@gmail.com>
- Cc: Héctor Pérez-Urbina <hector.perez-urbina@comlab.ox.ac.uk>, "OWL 1.1" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
When people complete their actions they should change their status to "pending review". I now did this for 321 and moved it to the relevant section of the agenda. Thanks, Ian On 14 Apr 2009, at 17:30, Christine Golbreich wrote: > + Action 321 Review NF&R (perhaps after some > editing) / Elisa Kendall > > Elisa sent her review on 8 April, why is stil still as Due and > overdue Actions? > AFAIK, it should be removed from the Agenda. > > Christine > > 2009/4/14 Héctor Pérez-Urbina <hector.perez-urbina@comlab.ox.ac.uk>: >> Hello, >> >> This is a preliminary version of this week's teleconference agenda: >> >> 1. Admin >> * Roll call >> * Agenda amendments? >> * PROPOSED: Accept Previous Minutes (8 April) >> * Action items status >> o Pending Review Actions >> + Action 330 Communicate with Michael Schneider >> about doing the changes to RDF-Based Semantic in support of >> owl:versionIRI / Boris Motik >> + Action 329 Review and signal approval of >> changes made for owl:versionIRI / Ian Horrocks >> + Action 328 Review and signal approval of >> changes made for owl:versionIRI / Peter Patel-Schneider >> + Action 326 Implement changes for >> owl:versionIRI / Boris Motik >> o Due and overdue Actions >> + Action 299 Find and fix the to-wiki-links >> Jeremy complains about / Sandro Hawke >> + Action 321 Review NF&R (perhaps after some >> editing) / Elisa Kendall >> + Action 325 Send a comment to the CURIE folks >> about us not using them / Sandro Hawke >> * PROPOSED: WG will send LC comment to POWDER WG as per >> Ivan's draft >> 2. Documents and Reviewing >> * Publication Schedule (see Timeline) >> o Primer will be published on April 15th as Ordinary >> Working Drafts >> + PROPOSED: Primer is ready for publication as >> OWD (modulo outstanding review discussions) >> + Primer will go to Last Call when core spec >> goes to CR (scheduled for 1st June) >> * Slightly modified procedure for dealing with (2nd) Last >> Call comments >> o Hopefully there will be few if any comments from WG >> members, and these will not be treated in the same way as "external" >> LC comments >> o We will respond rapidly to LC comments (as they >> arrive) >> 3. (Technical) Issues Arising >> * Any last minute issues that need discussing? >> 4. Test Cases >> * Plans/procedures for producing/approving test cases >> * Problems with approved test cases? >> * Progress on tool support, e.g., for "species validation"? >> * How to organize related tests - e.g. same input but >> different results for DL versus Full/RL (e.g. punning/sameas) >> * PROPOSED: Approve some/all of the test cases currently in >> the test queue >> 5. Features "At-Risk" (just a reminder) >> * owl:rational support >> * rdf:XMLLiteral support >> 6. Additional other business >> >> Regards, >> >> Héctor >> >> > > > > -- > Christine >
Received on Tuesday, 14 April 2009 17:00:23 UTC