Re: Agenda TC 15/04/2009

 + Action 321 Review NF&R (perhaps after some
editing) / Elisa Kendall

Elisa sent her review on 8 April, why is stil still as Due and overdue Actions?
AFAIK, it should be removed from the Agenda.

Christine

2009/4/14 Héctor Pérez-Urbina <hector.perez-urbina@comlab.ox.ac.uk>:
> Hello,
>
> This is a preliminary version of this week's teleconference agenda:
>
>   1.  Admin
>          * Roll call
>          * Agenda amendments?
>          * PROPOSED: Accept Previous Minutes (8 April)
>          * Action items status
>                o Pending Review Actions
>                      + Action 330 Communicate with Michael Schneider
> about doing the changes to RDF-Based Semantic in support of
> owl:versionIRI / Boris Motik
>                      + Action 329 Review and signal approval of
> changes made for owl:versionIRI / Ian Horrocks
>                      + Action 328 Review and signal approval of
> changes made for owl:versionIRI / Peter Patel-Schneider
>                      + Action 326 Implement changes for
> owl:versionIRI / Boris Motik
>                o Due and overdue Actions
>                      + Action 299 Find and fix the to-wiki-links
> Jeremy complains about / Sandro Hawke
>                      + Action 321 Review NF&R (perhaps after some
> editing) / Elisa Kendall
>                      + Action 325 Send a comment to the CURIE folks
> about us not using them / Sandro Hawke
>          * PROPOSED: WG will send LC comment to POWDER WG as per Ivan's draft
>   2. Documents and Reviewing
>          * Publication Schedule (see Timeline)
>                o Primer will be published on April 15th as Ordinary
> Working Drafts
>                      + PROPOSED: Primer is ready for publication as
> OWD (modulo outstanding review discussions)
>                      + Primer will go to Last Call when core spec
> goes to CR (scheduled for 1st June)
>          * Slightly modified procedure for dealing with (2nd) Last
> Call comments
>                o Hopefully there will be few if any comments from WG
> members, and these will not be treated in the same way as "external"
> LC comments
>                o We will respond rapidly to LC comments (as they arrive)
>   3. (Technical) Issues Arising
>          * Any last minute issues that need discussing?
>   4. Test Cases
>          * Plans/procedures for producing/approving test cases
>          * Problems with approved test cases?
>          * Progress on tool support, e.g., for "species validation"?
>          * How to organize related tests - e.g. same input but
> different results for DL versus Full/RL (e.g. punning/sameas)
>          * PROPOSED: Approve some/all of the test cases currently in
> the test queue
>   5. Features "At-Risk" (just a reminder)
>          * owl:rational support
>          * rdf:XMLLiteral support
>   6. Additional other business
>
> Regards,
>
> Héctor
>
>



-- 
Christine

Received on Tuesday, 14 April 2009 16:31:27 UTC