- From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 09:29:53 -0400
- To: "Michael Schneider" <schneid@fzi.de>
- cc: "Ian Horrocks" <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>, public-owl-wg@w3.org
> I argued for not talking about "datatype maps" in the Conformance =
> document
> at all. I suggest to just talk about "(sets of) datatypes". My proposed
> revision of the section in my previous mail reflects this.
+1. It's always slightly bugging me see "datatype maps" exposed to
users of OWL, without any idea why they're supposed to understand them.
-- Sandro
Received on Sunday, 12 April 2009 13:30:03 UTC