W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > April 2009

Re: Document name "Conformance"

From: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 17:44:36 +0100
Message-Id: <D2A78E98-D2AB-42C2-811A-3C1E3BBFE27D@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
Cc: Mike Smith <msmith@clarkparsia.com>, Michael Schneider <schneid@fzi.de>, public-owl-wg@w3.org
To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
OK, I moved and renamed it.

I'm happy to leave the shortname change until the next round -- we  
should look at the complete set of names when we have more time and  


On 9 Apr 2009, at 16:50, Sandro Hawke wrote:

>> On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 10:27, Ian Horrocks  
>> <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk> wro
>> te:
>>> You are right -- this somehow got lost in all the excitement.
>>> I am (still) happy to make the change. Can anyone see any reason  
>>> why we
>>> shouldn't do so?
>> No, do it.
>> Will the shortname (currently owl2-test) also change?  It seems  
>> like it shoul
>> d.
> I agree, but let's hold off on the shortname change for this round,
> okay?  It's kind of a pain, and I'd love to see if we can get the
> shortnames and the text we use in bibliographic references to be the
> same, so users aren't seeing all sorts of different short names for
> documents.  Whatever changes we make would be easier to do all at  
> once,
> and of course have to be done carefully, and I'm busy enough for this
> round already.
>        -- Sandro
Received on Thursday, 9 April 2009 16:45:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:41:58 UTC