- From: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 17:44:36 +0100
- To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Cc: Mike Smith <msmith@clarkparsia.com>, Michael Schneider <schneid@fzi.de>, public-owl-wg@w3.org
OK, I moved and renamed it. I'm happy to leave the shortname change until the next round -- we should look at the complete set of names when we have more time and stability. Ian On 9 Apr 2009, at 16:50, Sandro Hawke wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 10:27, Ian Horrocks >> <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk> wro >> te: >>> You are right -- this somehow got lost in all the excitement. >>> >>> I am (still) happy to make the change. Can anyone see any reason >>> why we >>> shouldn't do so? >> >> No, do it. >> >> Will the shortname (currently owl2-test) also change? It seems >> like it shoul >> d. > > I agree, but let's hold off on the shortname change for this round, > okay? It's kind of a pain, and I'd love to see if we can get the > shortnames and the text we use in bibliographic references to be the > same, so users aren't seeing all sorts of different short names for > documents. Whatever changes we make would be easier to do all at > once, > and of course have to be done carefully, and I'm busy enough for this > round already. > > -- Sandro >
Received on Thursday, 9 April 2009 16:45:17 UTC