- From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2009 11:50:21 -0400
- To: Mike Smith <msmith@clarkparsia.com>
- cc: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>, Michael Schneider <schneid@fzi.de>, public-owl-wg@w3.org
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 10:27, Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk> wro
> te:
> > You are right -- this somehow got lost in all the excitement.
> >
> > I am (still) happy to make the change. Can anyone see any reason why we
> > shouldn't do so?
>
> No, do it.
>
> Will the shortname (currently owl2-test) also change? It seems like it shoul
> d.
I agree, but let's hold off on the shortname change for this round,
okay? It's kind of a pain, and I'd love to see if we can get the
shortnames and the text we use in bibliographic references to be the
same, so users aren't seeing all sorts of different short names for
documents. Whatever changes we make would be easier to do all at once,
and of course have to be done carefully, and I'm busy enough for this
round already.
-- Sandro
Received on Thursday, 9 April 2009 15:50:35 UTC