- From: Uli Sattler <sattler@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 18:24:34 +0000
- To: OWL Working Group WG <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Hi all, I had a look at http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Quick_Reference_Guide (and i don't know what role http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Quick_Reference_Guide_2 plays) and must say it has largely improved since last time i looked. - I would suggest to consider gathering all axioms into one 'section' (ie., one section 'vocabulary?' for classes, properties, datatypes. etc and one for axioms (on classes, properties, datatypes, incl keys and another one for declarations?)? - would it be possible to have "column headings" or an explanation thereof? And, even more grande, different syntaxes? As in the Primer? Perhaps this is too much, but one can always dream... - "Shaded constructs are only available in OWL 2." could be explicated by "and was not present in previous versions of OWL. - the third column often contains 'only' typing restrictions, whereas it contains some hints towards the meaning in other cases...I would suggest to unify this. - should we really have lists in the quick reference list? Cheers, Uli
Received on Wednesday, 5 November 2008 18:24:39 UTC