- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2008 16:02:24 +0100
- To: Boris Motik <boris.motik@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
- CC: 'Bijan Parsia' <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>, 'Sandro Hawke' <sandro@w3.org>, 'Michael Schneider' <schneid@fzi.de>, public-owl-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <490F1280.10709@w3.org>
Boris, I am not sure. First of all, the subset sign does display properly on IE, and I do not believe that is part of Arial either. Furthermore, if what you say is true, I could copy a text from the the IE screen, paste it into an UTF aware editor (I use jEdit) and, using a suitable unicode font, I would see the right characters. I tried it and it does not work... Ivan Boris Motik wrote: > Hello, > > I don't think it is the encoding that confuses MSIE. It seems to me that the problem lies in the fact that MSIE draws the correct > glyph, but it uses the currently selected font. Now the problem lies in the fact that, on Windows, the standard fonts (Arial, Times > New Roman, etc.) do not contain the characters for the mathematical entities. Thus, to draw some of these characters, we would need > to change the font to Symbol each time manually. This, of course, would be quite bad: Symbol is a font available only on Windows, so > the page would render incorrectly with all other browsers. > > BTW, there is one other problem with MSIE 7: it does not display the words "Grammar:" and "Example:" in the respective boxes. This > is because MSIE doesn't support CSS correctly. > > I really believe that we should not worry about MSIE. At best we can put a disclaimer on the documents saying that the documents are > best viewed with a W3C-compatible browser. > > Regards, > > Boris > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: public-owl-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-owl-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Bijan Parsia >> Sent: 03 November 2008 12:51 >> To: Sandro Hawke >> Cc: Ivan Herman; Michael Schneider; public-owl-wg@w3.org >> Subject: Re: wrong rendering of certain HTML entities >> >> >> On 3 Nov 2008, at 12:41, Sandro Hawke wrote: >> >>>> Just wondering... what about using UTF-8 everywhere instead of the >>>> entities? That might work. >>>> >>>> I of course know that it is a royal pain to copy paste UTF >>>> characters, >>>> but it would make us independent of possible browser problems >>> We could also use entities on the wiki and unicode in the TRs. In >>> fact, >>> the tool chain goes to unicode (since it works with the text in DOM >>> form) and back to entities at the end. I decided to use entities >>> in the >>> TR to keep the html-diff between the TR and wiki clean. >>> >>> This is somewhat related to the notion that we should have PDF version >>> of these documents. That would give IE<8 users another option. If >>> anyone really knows how to generate them, that'd be great. (I'm >>> not up >>> to speed on the current tools there. The last one I used was pre- >>> CSS.) >> PrinceXML does wonders. I have some students working with it now on >> generating nice pdf from S5 presentations. It has good, page oriented >> CSS support. >> >> Cheers, >> Bijan. >> > > -- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Monday, 3 November 2008 15:02:33 UTC