Re: comments in functional-style syntax

What happens if one authors such a document and then puts it on a web
server? How does the web server divine the character set?
-Alan

On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 8:50 AM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider
<pfps@research.bell-labs.com> wrote:
> I believe that the HTTP protocol allows specification of the character
> set, which would allow for other character encodings.   The SHOULD will,
> I believe, mean that if there is no specification of character encoding
> then utf-8 will be applied but maybe this should be explicitly stated.
>
> peter
>
>
>
> From: "Alan Ruttenberg" <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: comments in functional-style syntax
> Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 00:04:50 -0400
>
>> Hello Peter,
>> If one SHOULD use the utf-8 encoding, do we not need some way of
>> specifying if an alternate choice is made? Perhaps it would make sense
>> to simply specify this as a MUST.
>> -Alan
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 11:42 AM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider
>> <pfps@research.bell-labs.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Also for syntax:
>> >
>> > http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/index.php?title=Syntax&diff=14280&oldid=14275
>> >
>> > peter
>> >
>> >
>> > From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
>> > Subject: comments in Manchester syntax
>> > Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 09:16:55 -0400 (EDT)
>> >
>> >> I added Turtle-style comments to the Manchester syntax document.
>> >>
>> >> The diffs are at:
>> >>
>> >> http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/index.php?title=ManchesterSyntax&diff=14178&oldid=13954
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> peter
>> >
>> >
>

Received on Saturday, 1 November 2008 13:55:56 UTC