OWL 1.1 name and namespace URI

It has been suggested to me that there is a significant cost of change 
to developers who have already invested in the OWL 1.1 member submission 
design and the OWL 1.1 namespace

http://www.w3.org/2006/12/owl11#

If this is the case, then I think we should, in our first public working 
draft, highlight this issue and ask for feedback from such early 
adopters whether they would prefer us to change the namespace URI (and 
possibly the name as well) or whether they are happy to work with an 
unstable specification.


Jeremy

Received on Monday, 22 October 2007 16:33:09 UTC