- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 17:21:51 +0100
- To: public-owl-wg@w3.org
We are meant to publish something by early January at the latest. On the table we have a proposal that we basically publish the three member submission docs. Given that Jim and Deb both found that the lack of e-mail discussion was a problem - I wanted to go back to square one and try listing options - and seeing which of these options had some clear support. Option 1: (from telecon - with clear support) Publish member submission documents, with disclaimer indicating that while this are the focus of our discussion they are not yet 'consensus' documents - amendment from HP: perhaps not RDF Mapping Option 2: (variant of option 1) Publish member submission documents but only those parts for which we already have consensus, with stubs where we don't have consensus yet. I would expect this to emphasis subproperty chains and QCRs as the two main new consensus features I doubt that there would be enough consensus over any part of the RDF Mapping doc to make it worth publishing. Option 3: My proposal from the telecon, dropped due to no obvious support at the meeting: Start with an OWL 1.1 requirements doc. This would have the advantage of taking the possible readership of a FPWD with us; as opposed to the highly technical member submission docs, which are likely to only be meaningfully read by a tiny elite. Are there other suggestions ... or advocacy? While my preferences are option 3, then option 2 then option 1 - at the telecon I got the distinct impression that there was no support for anything other than option 1. I am happy to help advocate something else - but not in a minority of one. Jeremy
Received on Monday, 22 October 2007 16:22:28 UTC