- From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 22:18:52 +0100
- To: public-owl-wg@w3.org
A follow up point: While I think a "differences" bit is interesting and useful, it might be better to have a "transitioning" bit. In particular, it might be helpful to point out that faking QCRs is not longer necessary, etc. By and large we expect that the "what do I do to migrate my OWL 1.0 documents to OWL 1.1" section to consist of nothing but "Nothing! Your OWL 1.0 document *is* an OWL 1.0 document!", it still might be helpful to say, "How do I take advantages of new features in OWL 1.1 in my OWL 1.0 ontology". Or something like that. This may be a third party opportunity. Cheers, Bijan.
Received on Monday, 15 October 2007 21:17:34 UTC