- From: Bijan Parsia <bijan.parsia@manchester.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2020 08:14:23 +0000
- To: Jerven Bolleman <jerven.bolleman@sib.swiss>
- CC: Patrick J Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>, "public-owl-comments@w3.org" <public-owl-comments@w3.org>, "public-owl-dev@w3.org" <public-owl-dev@w3.org>
On Jan 17, 2020, at 08:08, Jerven Bolleman <jerven.bolleman@sib.swiss> wrote: [snip] > Redirects can not be done because it is a hash iri, so either the whole document is redirected or none of it is. Oy! I’ve blocked all that junk ;) > Redirecting the whole document is more risky than adding the two items. > On the other hand, I would leave it for the OWL3 WG to do it when the standard is next reviewed. > > It's not like it is a common source of trouble ;) Yep. We could always just have a document that contained a link or transclusion of the relevant bits. Or rework owl.owl to do the equivalent.
Received on Friday, 17 January 2020 08:14:32 UTC