- From: Ignazio Palmisano <ipalmisano.mailings@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 13:43:58 +0000
- To: public-owl-dev@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 17 January 2017 13:44:31 UTC
On 17 Jan 2017 13:38, "Svensson, Lars" <L.Svensson@dnb.de> wrote: Dear all, This is a newbie question, so please bear with me if the answer is obvious or has been answered elsewhere... >From what I can see, the OWL Syntax does not allow axioms stating that two annotation properties are equal [1]. Is there a particular reason for that design decision? My use case is to align two vocabularies and have found property pairs that are equivalent. I realise that I can use owl:subPropertyOf instead but the properties really are equivalent. You can use two sub property axioms to achieve the same result, but the main issue is that annotation properties are ignored, to an extent, by reasoners. I believe also that that might be the reason there is no equivalent axiom for annotation properties - they don't have the same semantics as the other properties. I. [1] https://www.w3.org/TR/2012/REC-owl2-syntax-20121211/#Annotation_Axioms Thanks for any insight, Lars
Received on Tuesday, 17 January 2017 13:44:31 UTC