- From: Uli Sattler <sattler@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 15:43:59 +0100
- To: Milan Zdravkovic <milan.zdravkovic@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-owl-dev@w3.org
On 11 Sep 2009, at 15:21, Milan Zdravkovic wrote: > Thanks Uli ! > > 2009/9/11 Uli Sattler <sattler@cs.man.ac.uk> > this is a difficult one: > > - I assume that Ab, B, and C are individuals, and that 'preceeds' is > 'directly preceeds' (otherwise, you should *not* conclude that A is > ConcurrentWith C. > > > Yes, "preceeds" is not transitive property > > - you can introduce a transitive superproperty 'preceeds-trans' of > preceeds and find all instances of the class (e.g., via OWL API and > reasoner or via the DL query tab in Protege 4): > > (preceeds-trans value C) or (Inv(preceeds-trans) value C) > > if A is *not* in the answer to this query, then you can assume that > it is ConcurrentWith C. > > > Thanks for the effort, but I would like to keep the ontology > meaningfull, that is to avoid using "supporting" concepts for > inference. I understand - but from " A preceeds B and C preceeds B,", it does not follow that "A isConcurrentWith C" -- unless you mean indeed that 'preceeds' is 'directly-preceeds'....and then you do need some transitive superproperty to talk about precedence in general?! > Do you possibly know why "preceeds some (succeeds min 2 > ProcessActivity)" is not working ? what do you mean by 'not working'? You need to give us more context and more detail on what it is that isn't working. Cheers, Uli > I am confused about this - existential restriction works ("preceeds > some (succeeds some ProcessActivity)") but cardinality - obviously > not ?! > > Cheers, Uli > > > > On 11 Sep 2009, at 12:27, Milan Zdravkovic wrote: > > I am a beginner in OWL, working on specific process ontology. I have > a problem in inferring the concurrency of process activities, for > example - on basis of asserted A preeceds B and C preceeds B, I need > to infer that: A isConcurrentWith C. > I was trying with modeling domain of isConcurrentWith with > (Manchester syntax): > preceeds some (suceeds min 2 ProcessActivity) > , where preceeds properties are asserted and suceeds is inferred > inverse property, but without success. > > Could you please help me on this ? > > > > > > > > -- > Milan Zdravkovic, > IT Business Development Consultant > Inovation Center for Information Technologies (ICIT), Faculty of > Mechanical Engineering, University of Nis > > Phone: +381 64 1144797 > Email: milan.zdravkovic@gmail.com > WWW: http://icit.masfak.ni.ac.yu/milan.zdravkovic > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/milanzdravkovic > Address: ul. Kovanlucka 58, 18000 Nis, Serbia > --------------------------------------------------------- > http://www.euraxess.rs > National EURAXESS portal: Facilitating researchers mobility to and > from Republic of Serbia
Received on Friday, 11 September 2009 15:00:28 UTC