annotation properties on restrictions

• From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
• Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 11:26:51 -0400
• To: Pellet <Pellet-Users@lists.mindswap.org>, public-owl-dev@w3.org
• Message-Id: <D38A03D7-3C2E-4509-A877-9E184253C79A@gmail.com>

If I give a name to an otherwise anonymous restriction, Pellet  
considers the resultant ontology OWL full. What's the reasoning  
behind this? How would the reasoning apply to the addition of  
properties, such as rdfs:comment, to the restriction?

-Alan

Received on Friday, 20 April 2007 15:27:09 UTC