- From: Kim, Soonho (KCEW) <Soonho.Kim@fao.org>
- Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 13:37:44 +0200
- To: public-owl-dev@w3.org
- Message-id: <BA453B6B6B217B4D95AF12DBA0BFB6690278BE19@hqgiex01.fao.org>
Dear all, I have two related ontologies. One contains concepts represented in multiple languages and with some relationships. The other covers only a little part of this ontology, do not have all languages, but extend it with many other related concepts. There are concepts that are the same in the two ontologies. Would it be better to reuse the URI of concepts in both ontologies or should I assign new URIs to the second (more detailed) ontology and use the equivalentClass construct? What it be better? For reasoning purposes what it is better? How does the current reasoner such as Pellet or Racer process owl:equivantClass? Concerning maintenance, the first big ontology may be maintained, the second one may be not. Thank you Best Regards, Soonho Kim Knowledge and Information Consultant WAICENT Knowledge Exchange Facilitation Branch (KCEW) Knowledge and Communication Department Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nation Viale delle Terme di Caracalla 00100 Rome, Italy Telephone: (+39) 06 5705 3409 Email: Soonho.Kim@fao.org
Received on Friday, 20 April 2007 11:37:53 UTC