- From: Wiegand <wiegand@cs.wisc.edu>
- Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 15:12:05 -0500 (CDT)
- To: public-owl-dev@w3.org
- cc: Wiegand <wiegand@cs.wisc.edu>
In general, I want to formally state in OWL that the subclasses from one
class have a relationship with some of the subclasses of another
class. Suppose men and women are subclasses of people. Also, makes of cars
are subclasses of cars. I want to state that men "like" Hondas and
Mercedes and women "like" Hondas and Fords. (Note, for simplicity, I'm
making this example up!)
Do I have to model this by including an anonymous subclass in the subclass
definition of men that has onProperty restrictions to Hondas and Mercedes?
And, do I have to make separate relationships (ObjectProperties) to Hondas
and Mercedes? example:
<owl:Class rdf:ID= "Men">
<rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource= "#People"/>
<rdfs:subClassOf> {anonymous subclass}
<owl:Restriction>
<owl:onProperty rdf:resource="menLikeHondas"/>
<owl:minCardinality rdf:dataType="&xsd:nonNegativeInteger">
1 </minCardinality>
</owl:Restriction>
<owl:Restriction>
<owl:onProperty rdf:resource="menLikeMercedes"/>
<owl:minCardinality rdf:dataType="&xsd:nonNegativeInteger">
1 </minCardinality>
</owl:Restriction>
<rdfs:subClassOf>
</owl:Class>
Is there another way to express what I want? This seems rather
convoluted.
Also, if the above is the way to model this, then, I don't
like having to define so many relationships ("menLikeX") but
would rather use a
general relationship, say an inherited general "likes" relationship
between people and cars. Is that possible?
Thank you,
Nancy Wiegand
Received on Monday, 16 May 2005 04:44:12 UTC