Re: OWL 2.0 ...

Jim,
 
After consultation with my companion Matthew West I withdraw my request for
a spatio-temporal entity in OWL 2, because it could make OWL unsuitable for
non-4D ontologies.
 
Our preliminary conclusion is that either we have to make a serious
compromise in what could be said - and how, or we have to use OWL as
something to build a more suitable language in. ISO 15926-7 may serve as
that language, once it has been converted to OWL.
 
Regards,
Hans
____________________________
Hans Teijgeler
co-author of ISO 15926-2 <http://www.infowebml.ws/ECM4.5/ECM4.5.html> 
author of ISO 15926-7
website www.InfowebML.ws <http://www.infowebml.ws/> 
e-mail hans.teijgeler@quicknet.nl
phone +31-72-509 2005                     
 
 

Received on Saturday, 16 April 2005 10:45:36 UTC