- From: Bisaillon, Brian (MGS) <Brian.Bisaillon@ontario.ca>
- Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 12:38:20 -0400
- To: <public-owl-comments@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <1C464124395D6A479177E3938FEFCDEA0534E78B@CTSPITDCEMMVX21.cihs.ad.gov.on.ca>
Hello Working Group participants, I work for the Government of Ontario and lately I have been conducting a lot research related to the use of Semantic Web technologies in Information Management. I am particularly interested in topics such as e-Discovery, Findability, Metadata, Ontologies, Open Data/Information Initiatives, Recordkeeping, Search, Visualization and many other interrelated topics as well. Our unit is kind of a think tank for Information Management here in my office. We are looking at innovative ways of dealing with: - Adopting open standards optimized for the semantic web - Better connectivity, communication and information sharing - Creating new semantic information models for common government transactions - Dealing with the Exponential Growth of Information - Ensuring government information is optimized to express knowledge (human and machine readable) - Establishing the electronic record as the official record (move away from paper records) - Identifying, attracting and retaining knowledgeable and skilled IM staff - Identifying business records related to organizational functions/activities/transactions - Implementing functional classification according to ISO 15489 and the DIRKS methodology - New tools to support reasoning and inference (i.e., correlating data to provide automation) - Providing Authoritative Information for Accountability/Transparency - Providing high quality knowledge for making business decisions - Reducing pressure, long hours, delays, project failures, e-Discovery litigation settlements - Separating classifying, organizing and finding information using metadata, search & visualization Challenges include: - BUY vs. BUILD mentality across government (a big problem when it comes to information management) - Competing standards for office file formats (ODF vs. OOXML debate; OpenOffice vs. Microsoft Office) - Lack of maturity in the industry (BI, ECM, EIM, Metadata, Portal, Search, WCM... convergence?) - Most COTS (Commercial-Off-The-Shelf Software) is not optimized for the Semantic Web (open standards) - Open Source Policy is restrictive and most of our procurements involve COTS through RFP/VOR process - Rapid changes in technology, increased complexity, disruptive technologies, limited staff - Research shows lack of user satisfaction with many of the aforementioned industry technologies - Users in need of a recordkeeping / records management system that is easy to use (too complex) - Too much vendor hype (EIM vendors claim to be able to do anything and everything; many acquisitions) - Very heterogeneous environment using many different APIs, data formats, languages and protocols Unfortunately, this is only the tip of the iceberg. We really want to explore what the Semantic Web can do for us to help us address some of these challenges. We see the power in the Semantic Web and at the same time we are struggling to find commercial and open source software that can be used in an enterprise-wide setting for a large organization such as ours. My question to you: What do you feel are the most viable commercial and open source software offerings in use today that use and/or combine technologies such as RDF, RDFS, OWL, OWL-S, RIF/SWRL and SPARQL to deliver: - e-Discovery and Freedom of Information Requests - Enterprise Metadata and Ontology Management - Knowledge, Mind Mapping and Visualization Tools - Semantic Enterprise Search and Findability - Web Services and XML High Performance/Reliable Messaging - Other Solutions? I understand that it's possible to combine the concepts of discovery, findability, metadata, mind mapping, ontology, search, visualization, web services, etc. Therefore, I've always wondered if any open source or commercial vendors have been smart of enough to look at all of those areas and combine approaches to deliver really powerful solutions? I know it's possible, I just haven't seen it yet. The most advanced sounding solution I've heard of with respect to metadata at least has been: http://www.hisoftware.com/press/mds2004.html http://www.hisoftware.com/press/mds60.htm http://www.hisoftware.com/SMPD/Index.html The problem they've discussed in their press releases and on their product page is the exact problem that our organization faces. This is the only solution I have ever heard of that addresses this so far. I want to find more solutions like this one. If these guys were smart enough to come up with this, I'm sure others were smart enough to come up with something as well. In the end, I figured this working group (the actual creators of the open standards in the first place) would probably be able to at least point me in the right direction. I'm in close contact with my manager and our Chief Information & Privacy Officer. I'm in a position where I can make a difference and this is why I'm asking for help. Sincerely, Brian Bisaillon | I&IT Policy Advisor Access, Discovery & Business Recordkeeping Phone: 416.325.8541 | E-mail: brian.bisaillon@ontario.ca Internet: http://www.accessandprivacy.gov.on.ca/english/index.html <http://www.accessandprivacy.gov.on.ca/english/index.html> Intranet: http://intra.collaboration.gov.on.ca/mgs/ocipo <http://intra.collaboration.gov.on.ca/mgs/ocipo>
Received on Sunday, 23 May 2010 21:49:01 UTC